In its strictest form, back-to-back refers not only to the repetition of contractual rights and obligations at different contractual levels, but also to the requirement that contractual terms be included at a level in lower-level agreements. As contractors increasingly outsource much of their work to others, the supply chain has become longer and more complex. It is important that all parties ensure that certain rights and obligations exist not only in their own agreements, but also in agreements reached by the parties with other parties. This ensures that the principal contractor is not responsible for all obligations to the employer, that subcontractors have enforceable rights, and that dates are coordinated throughout the supply chain. In such a scenario, the government authority may act as a junior lender, the financial (s) as a priority lender and the company (Y) as a borrower. Since the company provides credit to the two financiers with the same property, the senior creditor will in any event want to enter into an intercreditor agreement with the government authority in order to protect its interests. As a general rule, each party should be informed of the critical elements of the agreement for each act signed by two or more parties. Therefore, it is necessary for a junior lender to reach a clear ground before the start of the transaction and identify the fundamental issues as follows: In addition, a joint venture is often more relevant when it comes to obtaining financing and support for projects, since the joint venture is considered the child of the promoters, while in a consortium, the individual members of the team retain their identity and that a consortium agreement is not strong enough to ensure such funding. A company may add a holding contract to a contract if the selected service involves risks that the company does not wish to be held legally or financially responsible for. In many inter-credit agreements, it is often common for the chief lender to dictate the terms of the pledge.
However, in cases where a junior lender is not trading hard, the senior lender may disadvantage a junior lender. In some cases, a junior lender may face artificial delays on the part of the primary lender to seek authorization to enter into an agreement or right. Such an approach can thwart the process and force the junior lender to capitulate. A non-detention clause does not always protect against actions or liability. Some states do not respect harmless, nebulous or overly broad agreements in the language. In addition, the clause may be considered non-aigale if the signatories invoke a strong case of condemnation or seduction at the signing of a non-detention clause.